Notes – FCC VRS Workshop

View the entire video of the workshop.

  1. everyone claims VRS is a high priority for the government
  2. Sherrese Smith:
  3. must protect the integrity of the TRS fund
  4. public must have confidence in the system
  5. Jim Tobias, President, Inclusive Technologies:
  6. concentrate on the end user
  7. rapid changes in technology
  8. live video is spreading throughout the world
  9. Sheri Farinha, California Coalition of Agencies Serving the Deaf & Hard of Hearing (CCASDHH):
  10. we serve the community from the womb to the tomb
  11. fraud is widespread in government, not just VRS
  12. Sharon Hayes, Video Relay Services Consumer Association (VRSCA):
  13. sponsored by Sorenson but make our own decisions – we do not endorse Sorenson
  14. counter miscommunication by VRS providers
  15. need options – not a one provider monopoly
  16. many consumers new to VRS
  17. need to educate and empower our consumers
  18. we have not yet achieved functional
  19. Claude Stout, Telecommunications for the Deaf, Inc. (TDI):
  20. FCC doing an amazing job with TRS
  21. cannot interfere with the advancement of technology
  22. do not forget hearing individuals
  23. Rosalind Crawford, National Association of the Deaf (NAD):
  24. reading from the ADA – “functionally equivalent” – equal access to telephone network
  25. support national certification of interpreters and RID Code of Professional Conduct
  26. support FCC certification for VRS providers
  27. supports current system of payments
  28. Karen Peltz Strauss, Coalition of Organizations for Accessible Technology (COAT):
  29. represents 270+ organizations
  30. formerly with FCC, has worked with a VRS provider, has consulted for NECA
  31. need for greater rate transparency – open process – know what is covered
  32. greater dialog between FCC and providers
  33. providers need to know what is allowed and not allowed
  34. certification process needs to be improved
  35. FCC needs more staff
  36. backlog of petitions
  37. does FCC have jurisdiction over providers who work for other providers
  38. systems now are inadequate and not functionally equivalent
  39. greater interoperability with mainstream technology
  40. cannot keep VRS isolated from progress
  41. Krishna Jayakar, Ph.D., Penn State University:
  42. Gregory R. Rosston, Ph.D., Stanford University:
  43. strategy project for Sorenson – views today are his own
  44. economics are relatively straightforward
  45. VRS expanded dramatically
  46. main cost is interpreter time – no economy of scale
  47. can use competitive bidding to hold down costs
  48. Moderator:
  49. talk about fraud and abuse first
  50. Sheri Farinha:
  51. what is the FCC doing to spot fraud earlier?
  52. use independent auditors to catch fraud
  53. we are guessing now
  54. consumers want a fraud and abuse hotline run by deaf individuals
  55. also a whistle blower hotline
  56. FCC contact info on all provider websites
  57. terminate white label programs
  58. provisional certification for new companies
  59. need clear NECA guidelines
  60. electronic monitoring of CAs
  61. all providers show their costs
  62. Claude Stout:
  63. only 3 or 4 staff members monitor TRS nationwide
  64. FCC needs to meet with industry on a more frequent basis
  65. Karen Peltz Strauss:
  66. need a whistleblower program
  67. fear of losing equipment prevents deaf from coming forward
  68. FCC needs to rule on what is appropriate
  69. improve the certification process – strict requirements
  70. remove the states from the certification process
  71. VRS is not mandated so the states could choose not to provide it
  72. need for VRS oversight board
  73. Dr. Jayakar:
  74. consumers don’t monitor VRS closely because they are not paying for it
  75. monitor minutes without invading privacy
  76. Rosalind Crawford:
  77. define what is a reimbursable call
  78. standard is still functionally equivalent
  79. cannot infringe on deaf making calls
  80. defining legitimate business practices
  81. cannot pay people to place calls
  82. conduct is impermissible, not the content of the call
  83. Greg Hlibok:
  84. how can we have an open dialog with providers?
  85. Claude Stout:
  86. DRO needs more staff
  87. set clear policy for the industry
  88. Dr. Rosston:
  89. look at the economics of crime
  90. if you increase the possibilities of getting caught, fraud will decrease
  91. Karen Peltz Strauss:
  92. FCC action – not disclosure – is the problem
  93. providers report on other providers
  94. not enough FCC feedback
  95. example:  no automatic reporting of minutes
  96. FCC has not acted
  97. some providers using manual recording of minutes
  98. Michael Jacobs:
  99. can we elaborate

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

In accordance with FTC guidelines, you can find information about any relationships between the author and any product or service or company reviewed on this site, as well as affiliate and third-party advertising links, on our FTC Notice, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers pages.
Content on this blog is not intended for use as a source of legal, business, financial, or accounting advice. Readers are advised to seek the services of competent legal, business, financial, and accounting professionals.